US government supports OpenAI on training AI with copyrighted content
The Trump administration submitted a 20-page brief defending OpenAI's use of unlicensed copyrighted material in the lawsuit filed by The New York Times.
In the lawsuit filed by The New York Times, the Trump administration intervened with a 20-page official brief defending OpenAI's unauthorized use of copyrighted material to train its artificial intelligence models.
Intervention in the Legal Process
In the copyright lawsuit filed by The New York Times against OpenAI, the Trump administration submitted a 20-page legal brief supporting the artificial intelligence developer.
This submitted brief includes a defense of the ChatGPT maker company's practice of using copyrighted material without permission while training its large language models.
Emphasis on Global Leadership
The prepared text drew attention to the critical importance of the United States maintaining its leadership in the global artificial intelligence field.
It was emphasized that this stance is consistent with the executive order signed by President Donald Trump last year and aims for a competitive industry.
Copyrights and Fair Use
Large language models behind chatbots like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini are trained on massive databases including copyrighted books and articles.
While publishers find the unauthorized use of this data illegal, legal debates generally revolve around the concepts of fair use and transformativeness.
Economic and Scientific Progress
In the opinion submitted by the administration, it was stated that a misunderstanding of the fair use doctrine would hinder the development of large language models.
It was argued that this situation could weaken American economic dynamism and creative scientific progress.
The Future of the Lawsuit
Since the lawsuit heard in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York has not yet concluded, this brief does not constitute a direct court ruling.
Nevertheless, it is stated that the government's legal intervention could carry significant weight in the ongoing judicial process.