Mehmet Akif Üstündağ Evaluates European Championship and Terzic
TVF President Mehmet Akif Üstündağ made statements regarding Zoran Terzic's criticisms and future goals following the 2026 CEV Women's European Championship victory.
Turkish Volleyball Federation President Mehmet Akif Üstündağ evaluated the events following the 'Filenin Sultanları' (Turkish Women's National Volleyball Team) victory at the 2026 CEV Women's European Championship.
European Championship and Olympic Target
The Turkish Women's National Volleyball Team reached the championship by defeating Italy 3-2 in the final of the 2026 CEV Women's European Championship. TVF President Mehmet Akif Üstündağ emphasized that the only missing piece for the team after this major victory is an Olympic championship.
Stating that they are a team that consistently reaches the final stage in the Volleyball Nations League, Üstündağ expressed that they will make all planning together with the technical staff and players for an Olympic medal.
Health Condition and Emotional Moments During the Match
Referring to the drop in blood pressure he experienced during the match, Mehmet Akif Üstündağ stated that his health condition is good and there are no problems.
Drawing attention to the intense emotional moments during the match, Üstündağ expressed that the players hugging him and the excitement experienced deeply affected him.
Strong Reaction to Zoran Terzic's Criticisms
Responding to Zoran Terzic's criticisms regarding Vargas's status in the national team, Üstündağ argued that such remarks are unfair and ruthless.
Reminding that Terzic benefited from players with foreign status in his past club successes, Üstündağ said they will not give credit to the attacks made and that this situation serves as a source of motivation for the team.
Details of the Critical Challenge Objection
Speaking about the referee decisions and the challenge objection during the critical moments of the match, Üstündağ stated that he closely followed the play.
He conveyed that he showed a reflex due to the confusion that arose after the referee's decision on the play that took place right in front of him, and noted the importance of the objection made on the course of the match.