Contractual Management Debates in the Healthcare Sector and Italy's Solution Model
While the contractual management system in the Ministry of Health creates discussions on continuity in institutions, Italy's model of independent commissions and national qualification lists is being examined.
The two-year contractual management system applied in health institutions in Turkey leads to uncertainties during contract renewal periods, raising the question of how Italy solved this problem through independent commissions and national lists.
Contractual Management Model in Turkey
Many critical managerial positions in the Ministry of Health, ranging from chief physicians to provincial health directors, are filled through fixed-term contracts, unlike other ministries.
As contract expiration dates approach, the question of whether managers will remain in office comes to the fore, creating uncertainty within the institution.
Scope and Legislative History
The system in question was established by Decree Law No. 663 published in the Official Gazette dated November 2, 2011, and its scope was expanded with regulations in 2017.
Many positions from provincial health directors to chief physician assistants and expert positions are included in this scope, and those whose contracts are not renewed return to their former duty stations.
Debates Generated by the System
Contracts, which are generally made for two years, cause managers to change frequently and result in a significant loss of continuity in institutions.
In addition, various criticisms are voiced that this practice has become open to local political influences.
Italy's Alternative Solution Path
With regulations that entered into force in Italy in 2016, a national list consisting of individuals suitable for general directorship was established within the Ministry of Health.
Candidates are evaluated and scored by independent commissions comprising national and regional experts based on their education and professional experience.