Controversial referee decisions of the Fenerbahçe-Beşiktaş derby evaluated

Following the derby match played between Fenerbahçe and Beşiktaş, former referees Deniz Çoban, Bülent Yıldırım, and Seçim Demirel evaluated the critical incidents and referee decisions on the broadcaster's program.

Agbadou Incident and Penalty Expectations

The incident involving Agbadou's alleged handball, for which Fenerbahçe expected a penalty, was evaluated by the former referees. Deniz Çoban stated that the situation was not clearly understood when viewed from different angles and supported the referee's decision.

Bülent Yıldırım, on the other hand, stated that he was not sure whether a violation occurred in the incident and noted that there were subjective examples supporting the referee's decision to continue play.

Beşiktaş's Disallowed Goal

The issue of whether there was a foul prior to the goal scored by Beşiktaş, which was subsequently disallowed, was discussed on the program. Deniz Çoban argued that the referee made a major mistake by blowing the whistle and that the mobility of the play was not affected in the incident.

Bülent Yıldırım also stated that looking at the action as a whole, the whistle blown was not correct and the impact could be evaluated subjectively.

Tension Between Skriniar and Vlahovic

Regarding the tension between Skriniar and Vlahovic during the match, the former referees stated that control was lost. Deniz Çoban expressed that referee Halil Umut Meler lost control of the match after this minute and that yellow or red cards should have been given in the incident.

Bülent Yıldırım emphasized that the players fought and noted that either both players should have been shown a red card or Vlahovic should have been penalized for his action.

Moments When Kerem Aktürkoğlu Expected a Penalty

The incident in the penalty area involving Kerem Aktürkoğlu on behalf of Fenerbahçe, where a penalty was expected, was interpreted differently on the program. Deniz Çoban argued that the opponent's intervention continued and the incident was a penalty.

Bülent Yıldırım stated that he did not see a trip or obstruction on the feet, that even if there was a potential for violation, the impact was outside, and the decision to continue play was correct.