Debate on Artificial Intelligence and In-Class Technology at Emory University

Serdar HocamAuthor & Editor

Faculty members in the humanities and social sciences at Emory University discussed the impacts of artificial intelligence on education and the use of technology.

◉ 0 views
Emory humanities, social science faculty debate artificial intelligence, tech-free classrooms

Faculty members in the humanities and social sciences at Emory University evaluated the impacts of artificial intelligence on educational processes and the use of technology in classrooms, presenting differing views.

The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Universities

As artificial intelligence technologies continue to impact universities, institutions such as Columbia University and the University of Chicago Law School have suspended the use of technology in certain courses.

Members of the humanities and social departments working at Emory University also discussed the consequences of students' increasing dependence on technology.

Different Approaches Among Faculty

Hubert Tworzecki, Associate Professor of Political Science and Director of Undergraduate Studies, stated that with the spread of platforms like ChatGPT and Claude, faculty members hold divergent views regarding technology.

Tworzecki stated that artificial intelligence creates a unique challenge by enabling students to receive quick answers instead of generating their own ideas.

Changes in Course Structure

Stating that it prioritizes verbal communication and spontaneous writing assignments, Political Science Professor Zachary Peskowitz emphasized that artificial intelligence indirectly affects classroom structure.

Peskowitz noted that unrestricted device use can distract other students and reduce information retention rates.

A Firm Stance Against Screens

James Morey, Professor of English and Director of Undergraduate Studies, reported that he firmly opposes screen use in classrooms, except for special needs.

Morey stated that their department has resisted artificial intelligence-generated texts in student work with near unanimity.