YÖK's Opinion on Academics' Digital Incomes and the Debates

An official opinion letter sent by the Presidency's General Secretariat to YÖK stated that the revenues obtained by academics through digital platforms will be considered commercial activity pursuant to Law No. 657, generating widespread repercussions in public opinion.

Emergence and Scope of the Opinion Letter

Details of the opinion letter sent by the Presidency's General Secretariat to YÖK were reflected to the public via the press and initiated a notable debate in the academic world.

The related opinion examined the earnings generated by academics through websites, mobile applications, and social media tools.

Civil Servants Law and Prohibition of Commercial Activity

It was stated in the aforementioned letter that the digital revenues obtained are evaluated within the framework of the ban on commerce and profit-generating activities under the Civil Servants Law No. 657.

This approach laid the groundwork for various question marks and legal discussions regarding the manner of application and scope of the rules.

Academic Visibility and Social Responsibility

It was emphasized that one of the fundamental missions of universities is to share produced knowledge with society, and in this direction, digital channels possess a public space character.

Unlike higher education institutions around the world, it was expressed that the civil service mindset dating back to 1965 leads to contradictions in today's digital world.

Allegations of Intimidation and Deterrence

It was asserted that this situation could serve as a tool of pressure and deterrence, particularly for academics who are active in the public sphere and known for their critical views.

It was stated that the uncertainties brought about by the process and the possibility of potential investigations could force researchers to distance themselves from digital platforms.